Verification of the Rataraju Case - 9 -

Significance of Rataraju’s dialogue in present progressive tense

Rataraju, the personality of the subject’s previous life, had a dialogue in present progressive tense as follows:

(CL stands for the subject, Risa, and KP for the Nepalese woman, Ms. Kalpana Paudel)

CL: Tapai Nepali huncha?
  (Are you Nepalese?)

KP: Ho, ma Nepali.
 (Yes, I am Nepalese.)

CL: O, ma Nepali.
 (Oh, I am Nepalese, too.)

It is easy to inadvertently overlook the importance of this dialogue, but this can be considered as something extremely interesting and thought-provoking regarding the existence of the appeared personality of the subject’s previous life.

That is to say that Rataraju, the personality of the subject’s previous life, is apparently asking “Are you Nepalese?” to the Nepalese woman, Ms. Paudel in this present moment and seeing her response. This means that it is not possible to construe that “Risa is recalling a piece of memory from her previous life stored in her subconscious mind” as is often considered concerning the process of a past life regression.

This means that Rataraju is not a personality narrated by Risa by recalling the memory of her previous life. Thus, Rataraju must be an appeared entity (personality) that is different from what of Risa's present life. Mr. Inagaki suggests that it is more natural to construe this phenomenon that “the personality of the subject’s previous life, Rataraju, whose personality is different from what of Risa, expresses himself during the conversation by using Risa’s body (vocal cords).  〔Note from translator: Please note that Rataraju's personality is "proven" to be a personality of Risa's own previous life according to several investigations and hypotheses, and that this is not a phenomenon of a "posession" by an entitiy belonging to someone else. Regarding the difference between the phenomena where a personality of a previous life apprears and where a posession by an entity belonging to someone else takes place will be presented in a future article on this blog.〕

Rataraju’s personality that lived in a previous life does not own a body now, but is manifesting as a personality (conscious mind) existing at this present moment and making a conversation in present progressive tense.

According to Mr. Inagaki, this dialogue in present progressive tense is evidence implying the possibility of his unique working hypothesis for SAM Progression Therapy being correct, i.e. that there is consciousness of one’s spirit hidden in the abyss of the subconscious mind in a human body and that entities (personalities) from previous lives are living and existing there even now.

This is the last part of the verifications of the authenticity of the Nepali used by Rataraju.

From next article, verifications of the content uttered by Rataraju will be presented.

<To be continued>